Article abstract

Journal of Agricultural and Crop Research

Research Article | Published November 2019 | Volume 7, Issue 11 pp. 194-203.

doi: https://doi.org/10.33495/jacr_v7i11.17.138

 

Agronomic performances of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) R. Br.) varieties intercropped with legumes in Sahelian Savanna of Nigeria

 



 

 

J. A. Bassi1*

I.Y. Dugje2

D. Aminu1

 

Email Author

 

1. Department of Crop Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maiduguri, P.M.B. 1069, Maiduguri, Nigeria.
2. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), P.O Box TL6, Tamale, Ghana.



……....…...………..........................…………....………............…............……...........……........................................................………...……..…....……....…

Citation: Bassi JA, Dugje IY, Aminu D (2019). Agronomic performances of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) R. Br.) varieties intercropped with legumes in Sahelian Savanna of Nigeria. J. Agric. Crop Res. 7(11): 194-203.

……....…...………..........................…………....………............…............……...........……........................................................………...……..…....……....…

 Abstract 


A field experiment was conducted at Teaching and Research Farm of Department of Crop Production, under Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maiduguri, during 2010 and 2011 rainy season. Four pearl millet varieties: V1=SOSAT-C-88, V2=ZATIP, V3=LACRI-9702-IC and V4=EX-BORNO was intercropped with Groundnut (Var. Samnut – 14), Soybean (Var.TGX – 1830-2E), Cowpea (Var.IT89KD - 288) and Bambaranut (Var. Damboa white) each with 1:1 alternate row arrangement. The results revealed that, plant height, number of leaves per plant and number of days to floweing were significantly higher for varieties ZATIP (V2) and EX-BORNO(V4) than SOSAT-C-88 (V1)or LACRI-9702-1C (V3). Single leaf area was higher for SOSAT-C- 88 (V1) and) ZATIP (V2), while number of tillers per plant was higher for SOSAT-C-88 (V1) than the other varieties. Grain yield per plant-1 and harvest index (%) were significantly higher for SOSAT-C-88 (V1) and ZATIP (V2), while grain yield per ha-1 and 1000 grain weight (g) were significantly higher for SOSAT-C-88 (V1) than the other varieties. Grain yield per ha-1 was positively correlated with harvest index (%) (r = 0.76**), leaf area (r = 0.78**), grain yield/panicle (r = 0.85**) and number of panicles/plant (r = 0.92**). Grain yield of legumes was significantly greater when grown in association with SOSAT-C-88 (V1) or LACRI-9702-IC (V3) than ZATIP (V2) or EX-BORNO (V4). The variety SOSAT-C-88 (V1) + legume association had the highest relative competitive ability and grain yield advantage compared to the other intercrop combinations. The gross monetary returns were also highest for pearl millet variety SOSAT-C-88 and ZATIP grown in association with each of the legumes. Grain and fodder yields can be optimized by growing pearl millet variety SOSAT-C-88 in association with cowpea, groundnut, bambarranut or soybean, while monetary returns can be optimized by intercropping SOSAT-C-88 (V1) or ZATIP (V2) with any of the legumes in the Sudan savannah region.

Keywords  Pearl millet   legumes   intercropping   grain yield  

 

 

Copyright © 2019 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.

This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0

 

 

  References 

 

Baker EFI (1978). Mixed cropping in Northern Nigeria: IV. Extended trials with cereals and groundnut, Exp. Agric. 16:361-369.

Bassi JA, Dugje IY (2016). Effects of intercropping selected legumes on growth and yield of pearl millet in a Nigerian Sudan Savannah. Res. J. Agric. Environ. Manage. 5(2):037-047.

Dugje IY, Odo PE (2006a). Variety and inter-row spacing influence on Direct Estimation of leaf area index of pearl millet. J. Sustain. Trop. Agric. Res. 18:27-32.

Dugje IY, Odo PE (2006b). Effects of planting pattern and variety on leaf area index and grain yield of pearl millet intercropped with groundnut. Niger. J. Exp. Appl. Biol. 7(1):63-69.

FPDD (2012). Fertilizer use and management practice for crop production in Nigeria. Fertilizer Procurement and Distribution Division, Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Abuja Nigeria. p. 47.

Henrich CW (2013). Prelimary studies of intercropping combinations based on legumes –Cereals. Exp. Agric. 16:29-39. IAPPS (2007). New Sorghum/millet and other grains. IAPPS Newsletter No. 111, March 2007.

ICRISAT (2011). Millet Research. In International Crop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. Annual Report (2005). Patancheru A.P 562324 71:538-540.

Mkamilo GS (2005). Maize + groundnut intercropping in South East Tanzania: farmer’s practices and perceptions and intercrop performance PhD Thesis Wageningen University, Netherlands.

Ntare BR (1989). Evaluation of Cowpea Cultivars for intercropping with Pearl Millet in the Sahelian zone of West Africa. Field Crops Res. 20:31-40.

Okigbo BN, Greenland DJ (1978). Intercropping system in tropical Africa. In: Multiple cropping (As a Special Publication No. 27(1979):63-101.

Reddy MS, Willey RW (1981). Growth and resource use studies in an intercrop of pearl millet and groundnut. Field Crops Res. 4:13-24.

Willey RW (1979). Intercropping- Its importance and research needs. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstracts 32(2):1-10.